Matthew Axelrod, the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement at the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), told a conference held by the Society for International Affairs on May 16, 2022, that his agency is considering major policy changes to its administrative enforcement authorities.  Axelrod said the policy changes, expected to be rolled out in the next few months, are intended to incentivize export compliance by corporations under the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”).  First, BIS may begin publishing Charging Letters when they are initially filed, rather than waiting until the charges are settled months or years later as is currently the practice.  Additionally, BIS may begin rejecting ‘no admit/no deny’ terms often demanded by companies as part of an administrative settlement with the government.  Without such terms, companies would be expected to admit their wrongdoing to resolve administrative violations.  Civil monetary penalties may also be substantially increased to discourage companies from risking a small fine in lieu of investing in effective compliance programs, according to Axelrod.

For those cases where Commerce makes criminal referrals to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), companies should expect an increasingly aggressive DOJ posture.  In a November 2021 speech to the American Bar Association, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco indicated DOJ is considering weighing past violations of types other than the potential violations immediately before them.  Theoretically, in an export controls context, that could mean DOJ would take into account past violations in diverse areas such as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), tax, environmental, or other areas when DOJ makes U.S. export controls-related charging decisions, settlement offers, and sentencing recommendations.  To minimize the risk of costly civil or criminal penalties, companies dealing in products “subject to the EAR” should monitor federal agencies’ enforcement postures and invest in their internal compliance functions.

Husch Blackwell’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Team continues to monitor changes in export policy and enforcement by U.S. government agencies and will provide further updates as changes occur.  Should you have any questions or concerns regarding either the DOJ or BIS announcements, please contact Cortney Morgan, Grant Leach, Tony Busch, or Isabella Peek.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Cortney Morgan Cortney Morgan

An experienced attorney in the area of international trade and supply chain issues, Cortney advises foreign and domestic clients on all aspects of international trade regulation, planning and compliance, including import (customs), export controls, economic sanctions, embargoes, international trade agreements and preference programs.

Photo of Grant Leach Grant Leach

Grant focuses his practice on international trade, international compliance, securities, mergers, acquisitions and general corporate matters.

Photo of Tony Busch Tony Busch

Tony advises clients on export control matters pertaining to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Tony also provides the export control profile required for “critical technologies” analysis in Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States…

Tony advises clients on export control matters pertaining to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Tony also provides the export control profile required for “critical technologies” analysis in Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) matters. Additionally, Tony counsels clients seeking to comply with Census Bureau Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR), Bureau of Industry & Security (BIS) Anti-boycott Regulations, and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions.

Photo of Isabella Peek Isabella Peek

A love for international law drew Isabella to Georgetown Law and ultimately to Husch Blackwell.

Isabella’s early career experience working across the United States (D.C., Chicago, Reno, Omaha, Carson City), and experience studying abroad in England and Italy, solidified her ambition to work

A love for international law drew Isabella to Georgetown Law and ultimately to Husch Blackwell.

Isabella’s early career experience working across the United States (D.C., Chicago, Reno, Omaha, Carson City), and experience studying abroad in England and Italy, solidified her ambition to work with clients worldwide. Her passion for international issues is what first drew her to Georgetown Law School, and it later made Husch Blackwell a logical next career step.

Isabella’s skill and ambition made her a formidable competitor on the equestrian team in college, giving her the opportunity to build a high level of self-discipline and contribute to the success of a team. Her time management abilities helped Isabella perform at a high level both academically and as an equestrian. It’s that kind of accomplishment and organization that make her such an effective partner for clients and businesses around the globe.

Rick Shimon [Former Attorney]

Formerly with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations, & Compliance team, Rick investigated civil and criminal matters and provided compliance support to clients.