Listen to this post

On September 13, 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it has finalized the modifications to the Section 301 trade actions following the completion of its four-year statutory review in May 2024. As described in a prior post, on May 22, 2024 USTR released a draft list of imported goods for which it proposed to increase Section 301 duty rates. USTR’s proposal was intended to target “certain products from China in strategic sectors,” including lithium-ion batteries, electronic vehicles, solar power, steel, and aluminum, semiconductors, medical equipment and shipping. USTR also proposed limited exclusions to the Section 301 tariffs for imported equipment dedicated to U.S. manufacturing activity, as well as 19 exclusions for solar panel manufacturing equipment.

Following the release of its proposed list of Section 301 tariff increases, USTR requested comments on whether each targeted product and sector was adequately covered by the proposed list, and whether the rates of additional duty should be higher for certain products. With respect to the proposed exclusions, USTR requested comments on whether the subheadings proposed should be eligible for consideration in the machinery exclusions process, and whether any subheadings were omitted. USTR also requested comment on the scope of the 19 proposed exclusions for solar panel manufacturing equipment.

Products Subject to Additional Section 301 Duties

The final list of products just issued by USTR largely adopts the draft list released in May, with several updates “to strengthen the actions to protect American businesses and workers from China’s unfair trade practices following the review of more than 1,100 comments from the public.” The list is organized as follows:  

  • Annex A contains an informal table of the tariff increases under the 14 product groups specified by the President and the 382 subheadings and 7 statistical reporting numbers, the tariff rates, and years for tariff increases.
  • Annex B contains the 14 temporary exclusions for solar manufacturing equipment.
  • Annex C contains the HTSUS modifications to impose additional duties, to increase rates of additional duties, and to exclude certain solar manufacturing equipment from additional duties.
  • Annex D contains the Importer Certification for ship-to-shore cranes entering under the exclusion.
  • Annex E contains a list of HTSUS subheadings eligible for consideration of temporary exclusion under the machinery exclusion process.

Changes from the proposed list include adding 50 percent tariffs to subheadings 2804.61.00 and 3818.00.00 covering polysilicon and wafers, which are critical for manufacturing solar cells and semiconductors. Other changes from the proposed list include:

  • Increasing the 25 percent tariff on facemasks to 50 percent in 2026;
  • Increasing the 25 tariff on medical gloves to 50 percent in 2025 and to 100 percent in 2026;
  • Increasing the 50 percent tariff on syringes and needles to 100 percent in 2024, but excluding enteral syringes through January 1, 2026; and
  • Increasing duties on ship-to-shore cranes in 2024 but allowing for exclusions for cranes that fulfill contracts executed prior to May 14, 2024, and that enter the United States prior to May 14, 2026.

Steel and Aluminum

With respect to steel and aluminum, USTR determined that it is appropriate to use the same scope of products covered by the Section 232 investigations that were defined by Presidential proclamation. See Proclamation 9704 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Import of Aluminum into the United States), and Proclamation 9705 of March 8, 2018 (Adjusting Imports of Steel into the United States). After consideration, USTR determined not to increase Section 301 tariffs on subheadings covering upstream and downstream products related to steel and aluminum that are outside the scope of the Section 232 investigations, despite comments urging USTR to impose additional tariffs on these subheadings.

Exclusions

USTR added five additional subheadings that “appear to include machinery used to physically alter goods in the manufacturing process” which are:

  • 8421.21.00 (Machinery and apparatus for filtering or purifying water);
  • 8421.29.00 (Filtering or purifying machinery and apparatus for liquids, nesoi);
  • 8421.39.01 (Filtering or purifying machinery and apparatus for gases, other than intake air filters or catalytic conv. for internal combustion engines);
  • 8428.70.00 (Industrial robots); and
  • 34 8443.19.30 (Printing machinery, nesoi).

The USTR determined not to add subheadings outside of Chapters 84 and 85 or subheadings that only include parts, accessories, consumables, or general equipment that is unable to physically change a good.

USTR also determined not to adopt five of the 19 proposed exclusions for solar panel manufacturing equipment, for which commenters noted that alternate sources for the machinery were available both domestically and in Europe, and other commenters noted that “excluding Chinese equipment would disincentivize companies to purchase from alternative sources and negatively impact burgeoning supply chains.”

Tariff increases in 2024 take effect on September 27, 2024, although exclusions for solar equipment are retroactive to January 1, 2024 and expire in May 31, 2025.

***

The Husch Blackwell trade team is following this closely and will follow up with further information as we get it.  Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions about the foregoing.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jamie Shookman Jamie Shookman

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings of the federal agencies involved. She primarily represents domestic manufacturers, advising on complex regulatory regimes, proactively assessing new trade programs, and handling litigation as it arises.

Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.

Daniel Wilson

Dan represents clients in a variety of complex international trade matters, including antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings and high-stakes enforcement matters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Dan has substantial experience representing a broad range of both U.S.-based and foreign companies in antidumping…

Dan represents clients in a variety of complex international trade matters, including antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings and high-stakes enforcement matters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Dan has substantial experience representing a broad range of both U.S.-based and foreign companies in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings before the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission.

Photo of Jeffrey Neeley Jeffrey Neeley

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export…

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export control, and other import/export issues.