On May 16, 2024, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it is adding twenty-six entities to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (“UFLPA”) Entity List, the consolidated register of four lists required by section 2(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the UFLPA. The UFLPA and its Entity List are explained in more detail in a prior post. DHS added these latest entities to section 2(d)(2)(B)(v) of the Entity List, which identifies facilities and entities that source material from Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (“XUAR”) or from persons working with the government of Xinjiang or the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps for purposes of the “poverty alleviation” program, or the “pairing-assistance” program, or any other government labor scheme that uses forced labor. The update significantly expands the UFLPA Entity List, which now includes 65 entities in total. Inclusion in the list triggers a rebuttable presumption that the listed entities’ goods were made with forced labor and are prohibited from import into the United States.

Husch Blackwell continues to monitor developments relating to the UFLPA. In the meantime, for guidance or questions relating to U.S. customs and trade laws, companies can contact Husch Blackwell’s International Trade and Supply Chain team.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dimitri Zografi Dimitri Zografi

Dimitri assists clients with real estate matters. He focuses on the development and tax side of real estate. Dimitri is known for his hard work, dedication, and genuine passion for his practice area, and he uses his background in economics and mathematics, his

Dimitri assists clients with real estate matters. He focuses on the development and tax side of real estate. Dimitri is known for his hard work, dedication, and genuine passion for his practice area, and he uses his background in economics and mathematics, his legal training, and his past experiences to provide the best possible service.

Photo of Jamie Shookman Jamie Shookman

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings of the federal agencies involved. She primarily represents domestic manufacturers, advising on complex regulatory regimes, proactively assessing new trade programs, and handling litigation as it arises.

Photo of Jeffrey Neeley Jeffrey Neeley

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export…

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export control, and other import/export issues.