As previewed over the course of the last month, the Biden Administration has announced that intends to increase Section 301 tariff rates for a host of products, including critical minerals used in battery production, and solar cells and modules. Today’s announcement comes in the context of the U.S. Trade Representative completing its four-year review of the Section 301 tariffs imposed during the Trump Administration on a broad range of imports from China. USTR’s report is available here. At this point, USTR has not provided further detail on the proposed increases beyond listing the following categories of goods to be affected:

Battery parts (non-lithium-ion batteries)        Increase rate to 25% in 2024
Electric vehicles        Increase rate to 100% in 2024
Facemasks      Increase rate to 25% in 2024
Lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries         Increase rate to 25% in 2024
Lithium-ion non-electrical vehicle batteriesIncrease rate to 25% in 2026
Medical gloves           Increase rate to 25% in 2026
Natural graphiteIncrease rate to 25% in 2026
Other critical mineralsIncrease rate to 25% in 2024
Permanent magnetsIncrease rate to 25% in 2026
Semiconductors         Increase rate to 50% in 2025
Ship to shore cranes   Increase rate to 25% in 2024
Solar cells (whether or not assembled into modules)Increase rate to 50% in 2024
Steel and aluminum productsIncrease rate to 25% in 2024
Syringes and needles             Increase rate to 50% in 2024

The proposed modifications to the Section 301 measures also include recommendations for an exclusions process targeting machinery used in domestic manufacturing and a list of temporary exclusions to be granted. USTR also recommends further resources for increased Section 301 enforcement by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The report notes that existing Section 301 exclusions are set to expire on May 31, 2024 but does not express any intention to renew these exclusions.

USTR intends to publish a Federal Register notice next week outlining further details of the proposed increased and the comment process in advance of the proposed modifications to the Section 301 measures.

The Husch Blackwell trade team is following this closely and will follow up with further information as we get it.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Daniel Wilson

Dan represents clients in a variety of complex international trade matters, including antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings and high-stakes enforcement matters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Dan has substantial experience representing a broad range of both U.S.-based and foreign companies in antidumping…

Dan represents clients in a variety of complex international trade matters, including antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings and high-stakes enforcement matters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Dan has substantial experience representing a broad range of both U.S.-based and foreign companies in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings before the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission.

Photo of Cortney Morgan Cortney Morgan

An experienced attorney in the area of international trade and supply chain issues, Cortney advises foreign and domestic clients on all aspects of international trade regulation, planning and compliance, including import (customs), export controls, economic sanctions, embargoes, international trade agreements and preference programs.

Photo of Jamie Shookman Jamie Shookman

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings of the federal agencies involved. She primarily represents domestic manufacturers, advising on complex regulatory regimes, proactively assessing new trade programs, and handling litigation as it arises.

Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.